1961 BMW 501 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1961 BMW 501. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 BMW 501 weights approximately 370 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1961 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 BMW 501 (182 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1961 BMW 501 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1961 BMW 501 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | 501 | Smart |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 182 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 110 L | 47 L |