1961 BMW 501 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 501 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP) has 448 more horse power than 1961 BMW 501. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 569 kg more than 1961 BMW 501. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm) has 565 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 BMW 501. (182 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 BMW 501.

Compare all specifications:

1961 BMW 501 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 501 CTS-V
Year Released 1961 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2580 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 100 HP 548 HP
Torque 182 Nm 747 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1345 kg 1914 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1884 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1422 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 110 L 68 L