1961 BMW 502 vs. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 502 would be higher. At 5,012 cc (8 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1961 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 105 kg more than 1961 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 BMW 502 | 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 502 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 5012 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |
