1961 BMW 502 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 502 would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1961 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 850 kg more than 1961 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 BMW 502 | 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 502 | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 4807 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2950 mm |