1961 BMW 502 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1961 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 248 kg more than 1961 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 BMW 502 | 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 502 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2770 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1658 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |
