1961 BMW 700 vs. 1987 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1987 Toyota Celica is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 700 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Toyota Celica (148 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1961 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Toyota Celica weights approximately 625 kg more than 1961 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Toyota Celica (180 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1987 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
1961 BMW 700 | 1987 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 700 | Celica |
Year Released | 1961 | 1987 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |