1961 Bristol 406 vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 2,216 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Bristol 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1961 Bristol 406. (92 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1961 Bristol 406. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Bristol 406 weights approximately 804 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Bristol 406. (174 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Bristol 406.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Bristol 406 | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | Bristol | Lotus |
| Model | 406 | Extreme |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2216 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2420 mm |
