1961 Bristol 406 vs. 2002 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 2002 Seat Alhambra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 2,216 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Bristol 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Seat Alhambra (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1961 Bristol 406. (92 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1961 Bristol 406. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 408 kg more than 1961 Bristol 406. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Bristol 406 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Bristol 406. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Seat Alhambra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Seat Alhambra (214 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Bristol 406. (174 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Seat Alhambra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Bristol 406. 2002 Seat Alhambra has automatic transmission and 1961 Bristol 406 has manual transmission. 1961 Bristol 406 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Seat Alhambra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Bristol 406 | 2002 Seat Alhambra | |
| Make | Bristol | Seat |
| Model | 406 | Alhambra |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2216 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 214 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.7 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.6 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1668 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 55 L |
