1961 Bristol 406 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1961 Bristol 406. (92 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1961 Bristol 406. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 540 kg more than 1961 Bristol 406. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Bristol 406. (174 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Bristol 406.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Bristol 406 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | 406 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 78 L |