1961 Bristol 406 vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 2,216 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Bristol 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Bristol 406 (92 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Bristol 406 should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1961 Bristol 406 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Bristol 406. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Bristol 406 | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 406 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2216 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |
