1961 Bristol 407 vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Bristol 407. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Bristol 407 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Bristol 407 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1961 Bristol 407. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 1961 Bristol 407. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Bristol 407 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Bristol 407 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM). This means 1961 Bristol 407 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Bristol 407 | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
Make | Bristol | Mazda |
Model | 407 | RX-Evolv |
Year Released | 1961 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5130 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 9000 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 214 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |