1961 Bristol 407 vs. 2000 Buick Cielo

To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Bristol 407. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Bristol 407 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Bristol 407 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1961 Bristol 407. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1961 Bristol 407. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Cielo weights approximately 175 kg more than 1961 Bristol 407. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1961 Bristol 407 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Bristol 407. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Bristol 407 (463 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Buick Cielo. (387 Nm). This means 1961 Bristol 407 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Buick Cielo.

Compare all specifications: