1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1948 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1961 Cadillac 62 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1948 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 1948 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1948 |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2850 mm |
