1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1962 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1961 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 40 L |