1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 62 | Starfire |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |
