1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1968 Ford 17
To start off, 1968 Ford 17 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1968 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1968 Ford 17 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | 17 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 60.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |