1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 1969 Volkswagen 1600 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1969 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1969 Volkswagen 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Volkswagen 1600 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | 62 | 1600 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 40 L |
