1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1978 Zastava 132
To start off, 1978 Zastava 132 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 975 kg more than 1978 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 440 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1978 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | 62 | 132 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1978 |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 142 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2560 mm |