1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1979 Seat 131
To start off, 1979 Seat 131 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1979 Seat 131. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1979 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Seat 131, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1979 Seat 131 | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | 62 | 131 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2500 mm |