1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1089 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Cadillac | Matra-Simca |
Model | 62 | Murena |
Year Released | 1961 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 91.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 81.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1051 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2440 mm |