1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Dodge Omni
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | Omni |
Year Released | 1961 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1716 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 49 L |