1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Datsun 280
To start off, 1983 Datsun 280 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1983 Datsun 280. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 685 kg more than 1983 Datsun 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Datsun 280. (275 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Datsun 280.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Datsun 280 | |
Make | Cadillac | Datsun |
Model | 62 | 280 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 275 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2330 mm |