1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1986 Ford Meteor
To start off, 1986 Ford Meteor is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1986 Ford Meteor. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Meteor.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Meteor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 461 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Meteor. (121 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Meteor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 1986 Ford Meteor | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Meteor |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
