1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1986 Holden Astra

To start off, 1986 Holden Astra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1215 kg more than 1986 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 467 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (115 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra.

Compare all specifications: