1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1989 Holden Camira
To start off, 1989 Holden Camira is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1989 Holden Camira. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1989 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1989 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1989 Holden Camira | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | Camira |
Year Released | 1961 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2580 mm |