1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1990 Jaguar XJR-11
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 (741 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 544 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 (800 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Cadillac 62. (582 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XJR-11 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 741 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 800 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1020 mm |