1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1991 Tata Estate
To start off, 1991 Tata Estate is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1991 Tata Estate. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1991 Tata Estate. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1991 Tata Estate. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 464 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Tata Estate. (118 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Tata Estate.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1991 Tata Estate | |
Make | Cadillac | Tata |
Model | 62 | Estate |
Year Released | 1961 | 1991 |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 118 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2830 mm |