1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1993 Fiat Punto
To start off, 1993 Fiat Punto is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Fiat Punto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Fiat Punto. (137 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Fiat Punto.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 1993 Fiat Punto | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Punto |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2460 mm |
