1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1993 Ford Focus
To start off, 1993 Ford Focus is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Focus (227 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Focus. (305 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1993 Ford Focus | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Focus |
Year Released | 1961 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1230 mm |