1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1994 Caterham Seven
To start off, 1994 Caterham Seven is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1994 Caterham Seven. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1994 Caterham Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1600 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1994 Caterham Seven | |
Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
Model | 62 | Seven |
Year Released | 1961 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 165 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 86.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2240 mm |