1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6389 cc | 2614 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 65 L |
