1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 735 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | F200 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6389 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 408 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1405 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |
