1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Rover 400
To start off, 1997 Rover 400 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1997 Rover 400. (110 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 400.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Rover 400 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | 62 | 400 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2560 mm |