1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Volvo S70
To start off, 1997 Volvo S70 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1997 Volvo S70. (124 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1997 Volvo S70.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Volvo S70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 412 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Volvo S70. (170 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Volvo S70.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Volvo S70 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | S70 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |