1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Citroen C3

To start off, 1999 Citroen C3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1999 Citroen C3. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 976 kg more than 1999 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Cadillac 62 1999 Citroen C3
Make Cadillac Citroen
Model 62 C3
Year Released 1961 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6389 cc 1587 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 197 HP 90 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 78.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 82 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2140 kg 1164 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 3680 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2450 mm