1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (213 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 305 kg more than 1961 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1961 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 7275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3510 mm |