1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1999 Ford Windstar is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6389 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3066 mm |
