1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2000 Smart Roadster is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2000 Smart Roadster. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1255 kg more than 2000 Smart Roadster. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Cadillac | Smart |
Model | 62 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 67 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |