1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2000 Vector RD 180 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2000 Vector RD 180. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 407 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Vector RD 180. (175 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Vector |
| Model | 62 | RD 180 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 81.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2390 mm |
