1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJR is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 301 kg more than 2001 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jaguar XJR. (525 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jaguar XJR.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XJR |
Year Released | 1961 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 525 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1769 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |