1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Cadillac 62. (582 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Holden HSV | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | HSV |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 5698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 692 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |