1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2002 Mazda B2500 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2002 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2002 Mazda B2500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | B2500 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2990 mm |