1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 790 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XF |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 7000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1240 mm |