1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | 62 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |