1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2004 Cadillac SRX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2004 Cadillac SRX.
Because 2004 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | 62 | SRX |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 3556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2960 mm |