1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2004 Kia Sedona is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Kia Sedona. (195 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Sedona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Sedona weights approximately 38 kg more than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Kia Sedona | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | 62 | Sedona |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 3490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2178 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |