1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Land Rover Freelander. (174 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Land Rover Freelander.
Because 2004 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Land Rover Freelander. (240 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Land Rover Freelander.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | Freelander |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 174 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |