1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (130 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 684 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (183 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 183 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 62 L |