1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2004 Pagani Zonda is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 350 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 820 kg more than 2004 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pagani Zonda (750 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Cadillac 62. (582 Nm). This means 2004 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Cadillac | Pagani |
Model | 62 | Zonda |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 547 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 750 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2730 mm |