1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Volvo S80

To start off, 2004 Volvo S80 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2004 Volvo S80. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo S80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 524 kg more than 2004 Volvo S80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Cadillac 62 2004 Volvo S80
Make Cadillac Volvo
Model 62 S80
Year Released 1961 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6389 cc 2524 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 128 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2140 kg 1616 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 70 L